Google, on the other hand, has multiple of layers of management which need to report to thousands of owners, quite a few of which expect constant growth. If you have that with a single owner, she/he might be content with what she has and choose not to expand further. This is really a different scale than a local business. Not only would it hurt their bottomline, it would also hurt their products as they train on user data, which has quite strong network effects. Well, in this case, Google would leave billions of dollars in revenue and hundreds of millions of users on the table. > i've always had a problem understanding why big companies need to dominate all the market? If i have a successful local business, it's not hurting me that others do as well. Need to get a few bucks for the project? Call that statistical analysis machine learning and say that you're going to provide it as a service. The days of tuning such a system will be filled with false-positives, but it's the only way to accomplish anything near comprehensive anti-cheat. I've said this thousands of times, I'll use this opportunity to say it again : the only method available to routinely and reliably find game-cheaters is through constant statistical analysis of the players performance/inventory/score versus the environment they're in. The irony of the whole thing is that while game-devs rootkit clients in order to pull in more marketing data/telemetry/whatever else the ToS allows them to steal, the real game cheaters out there are using extremely cheap CotS parts to create artificial man-in-the-middle clients that they can manipulate instead, with the host PC totally oblivious that the computer that's plugged into it as a HID is the one cheating.
I don't know why it's suddenly fashionable/allowable to touch ring 0 as installed software, but here we are. that's going to be more-and-more commonplace, too. >Note: Valorant installs a kernel driver as part of the "anti-cheat" system described by many as a rootkit.
0 kommentar(er)
